The clash of old and new tactics on the battlefield is a stark reminder of the evolving nature of warfare. In a recent encounter, a Ukrainian drone emerged victorious over a Russian soldier on horseback, showcasing the power of modern weaponry against traditional military strategies.
Russia's invasion has brought technological advancements to the forefront, with drones and hypersonic missiles changing the game. However, Russia's limited access to military vehicles has led to an unconventional approach, with some of President Putin's troops turning to horses to navigate through muddy terrain and launch assaults on Ukrainian positions.
But here's where it gets controversial...
Putin's decision to call up mounted troops has sparked debate. The 92nd Separate Assault Brigade of Ukraine shared a video on social media, showcasing the destruction of Russia's so-called cavalry by their precise drone strikes. The video, dated December 26, shows a Ukrainian FPV drone attacking a Russian soldier on horseback, resulting in the soldier's fall and the drone's subsequent crash into him.
And this is the part most people miss...
While the brigade claimed that no horses were injured, another video shared by them seemed to contradict this statement, showing a horse injured or killed alongside the Russian soldier. The fate of another mounted soldier remains unknown.
The widespread use of FPV drones by both Russian and Ukrainian forces has created an extensive kill zone, where any movement becomes a potential target.
Semyon Pegov, a pro-war Russian blogger, reported in October that Russian soldiers were training horseback troops. He explained that horses offer advantages such as good night vision, the ability to accelerate without roads, and instincts that may help avoid mines. Pegov even shared a video of mounted troops galloping with Russian drones overhead.
In addition to horses, Russian soldiers have employed donkeys to transport ammunition between their lines. Viktor Sobolev, a retired general and current member of the Russian parliament's defence committee, justified this tactic, stating that it is better for a donkey to be killed than risking the lives of two soldiers in a vehicle.
The clash between old and new tactics raises questions about the future of warfare and the role of technology. As we witness the evolution of military strategies, it is clear that the battlefield is a dynamic and ever-changing environment.
What are your thoughts on this clash of tactics? Do you think the use of horses and donkeys is a desperate measure or a clever strategy? Share your opinions in the comments and let's discuss the evolving nature of warfare!
